Omit Using "So" or "Just" to begin a sentence Essay (Alicia Dull)This is a featured page

Style Rule: Omit using needless words to start a sentence (ex: so, just)

There are an endless amount of rules to writing with good style. I thought I knew a lot about writing until I read The Elements of Style by William Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White, and Style: Toward Clarity and Grace by Joseph M. Williams. These books share information for any type of writer, and try to teach you to write with great improved style. I tweaked one of Strunk and White’s rules to talk about in this short paper. I will discuss how I came up with it, the rule itself (including when and how to use it), and what these authors would have to say about it.

The rule I came up with has always been a pet peeve of mine. You would find this out if I were to ever critique or edit your writing. My style rule is to not begin a sentence with the words “so” or “just.” The details of my rule are as follows, just as I have posted in the “English 328 Style Rules Wiki”:

Most of the time you should not begin a sentence with the word “just” or “so,” along with all other coordinating conjunctions, for example:


Instead of using “So” here:
“So what we are going to do today is…”
try omitting it:
What we are going to do today is…”

Examples that need rewording:
1a) Just today I figured out what to get Katie for her birthday.
2a) Just so you don’t get confused, I am going to mail you directions.
3a) And then she said yes!
4a) So, the first step is to register.

To fix these sentences, simply omit the first words or reword your sentence so you do not begin it with these “needless words”:

1b) Today I figured out what to get Katie for her birthday.
OR: I figured out today what to get Katie for her birthday.
2b) I am going to mail you the directions so you do not get confused.
3b) Then she said yes! OR: She said yes!
4b) The first step is to register.

Other coordinating conjunctions include
for, and, nor, but, or, and yet
Omitting these words to begin a sentence will stop them from taking emphasis away from the point of your sentence; it also sounds better.

The first style book I read was Strunk and White’s The Elements of Style. The edition I read was surprisingly short, roughly 120 pages, but packed full of precise rules and commands. (Maybe you could rephrase one of the first two sentences so that you don't have "I read" in both of them). I agree. The beginning of this paragraph does not look like it is geared to any audience other than our classes-Liz Brose I kind of think you could even omit the first two sentences and just rephrase this next sentence to say where the rules came from (The Elements of Style). I felt that these rules did not leave you any wiggle room; they were set guidelines that you MUST strictly follow. They did not give much of an explanation as to why the rule was in place or how to incorporate these rules into your writing. Although insert comma-LB I was able to come up with a rule on my own, I noticed it goes along with Strunk and White’s rule to “Omit Needless Words.” Page number, or MLA citation-LB This is what they had to say on this topic:Sentence should be lowercase- AH “A Sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts” (39). My rule is a bit different from theirs in that mine specifies words to omit when beginning a sentence; their rule omits needless words throughout the sentence. I think that this paragraph has a lot of good information in it. I would condiser re-working it and being more specific before you introduce the quote. Watch situations, you need to cite even when you paraphrase-LB

Beginning a sentence with these needless words(Which needless words?) Maybe instead of " these needless words" try "overused and useless words like "so" and "just." does not add anything to the sentence or to the writer’s point they are making.(Possibly rephrase, or to the point that the writer is making) (I am a little confused by the beginning of this sentence) It is an unnecessary word to distract the reader from the emphasis in that sentence or paragraph. What is an unnecessary word? This sentence is very vauge-LB Not only is the sentence vague, but it should be re-worked because I was confused after I read it-AH Some people may argue that it is acceptable to break my rule; and they may be right at times.Who may argue this? Try to be specific There are many writers who begin a sentence with the word “so” to continue on from a previous point, or to substitute it for the word “therefore.” I personally think “therefore” reads and flows much better;(I agree!!) you are letting your reader know you are tying up the previous points you were making and connecting them to the sentence that follows. Technically, you are not breaking any grammar rules by using these words to start out with, but you ought to make sure you know how to break this rule correctly so you do not take away from any ideas. I feel that if you have your style rule you have to own it. It's something that you thought was important enough to dedicate a paper to. Saying this, I feel that you should not be ok with people who think it is ok to break your rule. Just my feeling!-LB Perhaps you could suggest the reader (who may be a writer) try finding replacement words for "so" and "just" if they are going to use them at all.
(You mention some needless words from your rule later in the paragraph, but make sure you also mention them earlier; be more specific than "these needless words"). I agree-LB

Williams also discusses omitting needless words in a section labeled Folklore. Example? These are “rules,” that aren’t actual rules at all, that most writers ignore unless you are an educated and advanced writer. Compared to Strunk and White, this Replace "this" with Williams-AH book is a harder read; it is longer and goes into more depth on each topic/rule. Not only does Williams describe rules, he tells you how to use them and gives detailed examples so you can clearly see how these rules work with real pieces of writing. He(also would flow better here) touches on omitting needless words also, and even says that we are not to begin sentences with coordinating conjunctions, which goes along with my rule.(This would be a good place for examples or quotes from Williams) As I previously stated, I think there are ways to break this rule, but only if done so appropriately. This is why I chose to omit specific words when beginning a sentence for my rule. Williams made"makes"-AH a statement in his book about beginning sentences, but in doing so, broke my rule: “So the first step toward a style that is clear, direct, and coherent lies in how you manage the first few words of every sentence” (67). I would suggest leaving “So” off the beginning, seeing as how it adds nothing to the sentence.(Nice example..Good find)

(I agree that you could add more examples from Williams earlier in the previous paragraph to better illustrate your points).
There are many writers that break this rule continuously. It makes me wonder why it can be in both of these style rule books, and yet the rule goes overlooked. Perhaps, like me, Williams, Strunk, and White all felt the same in that these useless words at the start do nothing for the sentence except make it too wordy. (Consider rewording, gets confusing mid-sentence) “Bad writing has been with us for a long time, and its roots run wide in our culture and deep into its history” (Williams 10). My rule may not be significant when looking at the larger picture, but it makes a difference to bad writing, and to me. If you"Replace 'you' with 'one', it makes for a broader audience and fits my rule :)"-AH are conscious of what you are putting out there for people to read, it is a good idea to improve on the small things, as well as the large. This rule is, as Williams says, a “diagnostic principle,” not a “rigid rule” (xiv); take it as advice, and as a push to question the clarity of your writing, rather than stressing out about failing to abide by strict writing laws. (Nice points. Good way to promote your rule.)

Writing styles are important to be aware of when constructing a piece of work. Whether my style rule is noteworthy or not, it is a good idea to keep these kinds of criticism in the back of your mind while editing. You may want to introduce this quote if it is going to be most of your closing paragraph. You could also give more of a description about it after.-LB“If we include in our definition of correct both what is true and what is folklore, we risk missing what is important – that which makes prose turgid or concise, confusing or clear…[yet] it is those who let clumsy and imprecise language go unnoticed, or if noticed unrevised, that risk letting clumsy and imprecise prose become accepted standard” (196-197). You should not agonize over my minute rule, but do not let this become acceptable and get the best of your writing in the end.


Works Cited:

White, E.B. and William Strunk. The Elements of Style. New York: Longman, 2000.

Williams, Joseph. Style: Toward Clarity and Grace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995



No user avatar
amahan
Latest page update: made by amahan , Feb 20 2009, 5:05 PM EST (about this update About This Update amahan Edited by amahan

74 words added

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
More Info: links to this page
Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
amahan Omit Using "So" or "Just" to Begin a Sentence Essay 0 Feb 20 2009, 5:07 PM EST by amahan
Thread started: Feb 20 2009, 5:07 PM EST  Watch
I think overall you have a great idea and adaptation to Strunk's rule of omitting needless words. Overall your essay is easily understood, it could use just a little more explanation here and there though.

*My comments are italicized and green. ; )
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
ahowar15 Review 0 Feb 19 2009, 4:41 PM EST by ahowar15
Thread started: Feb 19 2009, 4:41 PM EST  Watch
Alicia,

Overall I enjoyed your paper, my comments are in orange. I think that Liz touched on many points that I noticed in your essay. The problem areas I brought to light involve mainly grammar issues. Good luck!
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
ebrose1182 Peer Review 0 Feb 18 2009, 4:54 PM EST by ebrose1182
Thread started: Feb 18 2009, 4:54 PM EST  Watch
Hi Alicia-
Your paper is a great start. My comments are in the bold blue font. I would just try to be a little more coherent and clear with what you are talking about. I have a hard time when I am writing to anyone that may come across my paper as opposed to just a class. That is where the calrity comes in for me. Good Luck
Liz Brose
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
Showing 3 of 6 threads for this page - view all